Irvine Preschooler With Speech/Motor Delays Wins Partial FAPE Victory on OT and Placement
A preschool student with speech-language impairment and gross and fine motor delays attended Irvine Unified's Early Childhood Learning Center. Parents challenged a series of IEP decisions across three school years, alleging predetermination, inadequate services, and a failure to offer a classroom placement beginning in February 2013. The ALJ found that Irvine largely provided an appropriate program but denied a FAPE starting February 6, 2013 by eliminating the student's classroom placement and failing to offer adequate occupational therapy. Irvine was ordered to provide 36 hours of compensatory occupational therapy and reimburse Parents $1,400 for private preschool tuition.
What Happened
Student is a preschool-age boy eligible for special education under the category of speech-language impairment. He also had significant delays in fine and gross motor skills, attention, adaptive skills, and social communication. Before turning three, he had received ABA services through the Regional Center. When he turned three, Irvine Unified conducted an initial evaluation and convened an IEP in January 2012, offering a mild-to-moderate special day class at the district's Early Childhood Learning Center, along with speech-language and physical therapy services. Over the following year, Irvine held multiple IEP meetings, gradually moved Student into a general education preschool with an independent facilitator, and added occupational therapy consultation in September 2012.
Parents raised concerns throughout this process — requesting more mainstreaming, additional related services, and independent evaluations — and ultimately removed Student from the Learning Center in October 2012 after he fell and was injured in the school restroom. They enrolled him in a private preschool (Immanuel Lutheran School) and filed for due process in November 2013, alleging procedural and substantive FAPE violations across three school years, including predetermination of placement, inadequate speech, OT, and PT services, failure to properly respond to IEE requests, and — critically — Irvine's failure to offer any classroom placement in the February 2013 IEP.
What the ALJ Found
The ALJ ruled in Irvine's favor on the vast majority of claims. The initial IEP was not predetermined — Mother had signed a written excusal of the general education teacher, the district described the full continuum of placements at the intake meeting, and the IEP team made individualized decisions at each step. The district properly responded to IEE requests: Parents withdrew the first request in writing, and Irvine agreed to fund the second (physical therapy) but Parents never provided the name of an assessor. Student's claims about inadequate behavior supports, speech services, and physical therapy were also rejected, as the evidence showed Irvine took reasonable steps to address his needs and he made meaningful progress.
However, the ALJ found that Irvine did deny Student a FAPE beginning February 6, 2013, in two specific ways. First, by failing to offer any classroom placement in the February 2013 IEP. Multiple IEP teams — including Irvine's own staff — had consistently recognized that Student needed a classroom, a teacher delivering intentional language instruction, and peer modeling to make progress. Student had attained only 2 of 14 IEP goals, and new independent assessments confirmed his need for classroom-based instruction. Irvine's decision to eliminate the classroom component, reportedly due to distrust of the independent evaluations and a desire for updated district assessments, was not supported by the evidence. Second, the occupational therapy offered — a consultative-only model — was insufficient given new evaluation data showing the severity of Student's fine motor and sensory processing deficits, and was rendered meaningless once the classroom placement (where the consultation was supposed to occur) was eliminated.
What Was Ordered
- Irvine shall provide Student 36 individual, 60-minute sessions of compensatory occupational therapy, delivered by a clinician with experience serving students with hypotonia and fine motor delays.
- Irvine shall reimburse Parents $1,400 for the cost of Student's private preschool placement at Immanuel Lutheran School following the February 6, 2013 IEP through the date of the hearing.
- All other requests for relief — including additional speech, PT, behavior services, and broader compensatory education — were denied.
Why This Matters for Parents
-
A district cannot eliminate a service that its own prior IEPs recognized as essential without a meaningful change in the student's needs. Here, every IEP team for over a year agreed Student needed a classroom placement. When Irvine suddenly removed it in February 2013 without evidence that Student had outgrown that need, the ALJ found a FAPE denial. If your district tries to reduce or eliminate a service, ask what evidence supports the change.
-
Consultative therapy is not the same as direct therapy — and the difference matters. Irvine's occupational therapy was structured as a collaboration between the OT, the classroom teacher, and the independent facilitator. When Irvine eliminated the classroom, the consultation had no one to consult with. Parents should ask: if a related service depends on a classroom or staff member to work, what happens to that service if the placement changes?
-
Withdrawing an IEE request in writing ends the district's obligation to respond. The ALJ found that Irvine was entitled to rely on Father's written email withdrawing the IEE request. If you change your mind about an IEE, you must re-request it clearly and in writing — a prior withdrawal closes the loop.
-
Private school reimbursement requires proof of payment. Student received only $1,400 in reimbursement because that was the amount supported by documentation. Claims for private OT sessions were denied because Parents could not prove they had paid for them. Always keep receipts, invoices, and payment records for any private services you may later seek reimbursement for.
Note: These summaries are for educational purposes only. OAH decisions are fact-specific and may not apply to your situation. Consult an advocate or attorney for advice about your case.