District Wins Right to Remove Violent Student to Nonpublic School Over Parent's Objection
Sacramento City Unified School District filed an expedited due process case seeking permission to remove a 15-year-old student with disabilities from his high school after a pattern of physical assaults, hate-motivated online threats, and credible threats of rape and murder. The ALJ found that keeping the student at John F. Kennedy High School posed a substantial risk of injury to other students and staff. The district was authorized to place the student at a small therapeutic nonpublic school for up to 45 school days without the parent's consent.
What Happened
Student was a 15-year-old tenth grader at John F. Kennedy High School, a large college preparatory public school in Sacramento. He had originally been found eligible for special education under the category of autism in 2012, but Parent withdrew him from special education in 2017. In fall 2021, the district requested permission to reassess Student, and by spring 2022 he was re-found eligible under the categories of specific learning disability and other health impairment. His autism eligibility was not reinstated.
Almost immediately after Student began ninth grade in September 2021, school staff became alarmed by his behavior. He was viewing violent content — including videos of murders and terrorist beheadings — on his school computer during class, reading Mein Kampf, and expressing admiration for school shooters. Over the course of the 2021-2022 school year, the situation escalated dramatically. Student physically assaulted approximately 12 students, most of them non-white girls and students who identified as LGBTQ, shoving them violently into lockers — sometimes while being recorded by a friend. He sent graphic online threats of rape and murder to students at two different high schools. His private therapist broke confidentiality to warn the school that Student's threats were credible and imminent. Student was arrested in May 2022 on felony hate crime charges and served 20 days in juvenile detention. When the hearing began in late August 2022, Student had just started tenth grade at the same school and was wearing an ankle monitor as a condition of probation. The district filed an expedited due process hearing requesting authorization to move Student to an interim alternative educational setting without Parent's consent.
What the ALJ Found
This case was filed by the district, not the parent, so the question before the ALJ was not whether the district failed Student — it was whether the district had the legal right to remove Student from his current school over Parent's objection. The ALJ found overwhelmingly that it did.
Under federal special education law, a school district can ask a hearing officer to authorize a temporary placement change — for up to 45 school days — if keeping a student in their current placement is "substantially likely to result in injury to the child or to others." The ALJ found that Sacramento City proved this standard by a preponderance of the evidence. School staff, including the vice principal, Student's English teacher, the school psychologist, and the social worker, all testified credibly that they were afraid of Student and believed he would cause serious harm if he remained on campus. Five police officers corroborated the school's concerns, and a search of Student's room uncovered neo-Nazi flags and high-capacity ammunition belts.
Parent and Student both testified that Student's conduct was not serious, and Parent characterized the physical assaults as "pranks." The ALJ firmly rejected this characterization, noting that the assaults were not consensual, not playful, and were specifically designed to intimidate and harm targeted students. Parent also advanced a conspiracy theory that the LGBTQ community — including school staff — had conspired against Student. The ALJ rejected this as well, finding that Student's own documented actions, not any conspiracy, caused his school problems. The ALJ found Parent's testimony unpersuasive and noted that her minimization of extremely serious conduct undermined her credibility.
The ALJ authorized placement at Point Quest, a small therapeutic nonpublic school in the Sacramento area, finding it could provide Student's IEP services in a more structured, lower-ratio environment with staff trained to address his behavioral needs.
What Was Ordered
- Within 15 days of the decision, Sacramento City Unified School District was authorized to remove Student from John F. Kennedy High School and place him at Point Quest or a similar nonpublic school as an interim alternative educational setting.
- The interim placement may last a maximum of 45 school days, after which the district must return Student to John F. Kennedy High School unless the parties agree otherwise or a new order is issued.
Why This Matters for Parents
-
Districts can remove a student to a different placement without your consent — but only if they prove a high legal bar. The law allows this only when a hearing officer finds that keeping the student in their current school is "substantially likely" to result in injury. This is an expedited process with strict timelines, and it is one of the few situations in special education law where a district can act over a parent's objection.
-
Minimizing or denying your child's behavior can seriously damage your credibility at hearing. The ALJ specifically noted that Parent's attempts to dismiss violent assaults as "pranks" and to blame a conspiracy undermined her testimony. If your child has had serious behavioral incidents, it is more effective to acknowledge what happened and focus on what supports your child needs — rather than disputing facts that are well-documented.
-
A student's prior eligibility category does not automatically carry forward. Student was originally found eligible under autism in 2012, but after reassessment in 2022 he was found eligible under different categories and autism eligibility was not reinstated. If your child's disability category changes, their IEP services and supports may also change significantly.
-
Even if a district has not fully implemented an IEP, that alone won't prevent a dangerous placement change. The ALJ acknowledged that the district had little time to implement Student's new IEP, but found that full implementation — even with an individual aide and behavior services — would not eliminate the substantial risk of injury given the severity of Student's conduct. The law requires that the interim placement still provide IEP services and a functional behavioral assessment.
Note: These summaries are for educational purposes only. OAH decisions are fact-specific and may not apply to your situation. Consult an advocate or attorney for advice about your case.